![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Mileage and elevation gain data appeared to be accurate, generally with 1-2% of the numbers reported by my 62s. My 62s has a bad habit of picking up my prior location and including it in the current track, even after I clear the tracklog at the trailhead! I never saw this occur on the 64s. This would apply to many other fast moving trail sports such as snowmobiling, etc.Įntering waypoints – No doubt about it, if you’re doing extensive naming of waypoints in the field, a touchscreen is much faster than the virtual keyboard found on the 64s. Mountain biking – With the buttons found on the 64s, you can change screens on the fly, without having to take your eyes off the trail. Should you go for a touchscreen like the Garmin Oregon series, or a unit with buttons like the 64s? Here’s a couple of use cases where they may make a difference… ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |